Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jaimee Fourlis vs Andreea Mitu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fourlis vs Mitu analysis and find out who is favored!
Jaimee Fourlis vs Andreea Mitu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fourlis 0 - 0 Mitu
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fourlis has won 40.92% of points on his second serve, while Mitu has won 37.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fourlis, in recent form, has won 52.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Mitu has won 57.87%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.16% and 39.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fourlis has saved 48.65% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mitu has saved 53.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fourlis has won 44.44% of matches played (W/L 16/ 20), with Mitu winning 61.29% (W/L 38/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fourlis has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 63% (W/L 17/ 10), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 86/ 76). Mitu has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 68% (W/L 310/ 148), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 48% (W/L 29/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Fourlis has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 46.15% of matches (W/L 12/ 14), where as Mitu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.41% of matches (W/L 38/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fourlis has played against opponents with an average rank of 216.31 while Mitu has played against players with an average rank of 256.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fourlis has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mitu has won 68% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fourlis has converted 52.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mitu has converted 46.37% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
294
Rank
147
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
222
Rank
68
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
57% (204-157)
Career Total W/L
64% (389-218)
37% (7-12)
YTD W/L
35% (6-11)
$275,258
Career Prize Money
$309,631
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jaimee Fourlis | Andreea Mitu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 37% (7/12) | 35% (6/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 38% (17/28) | 38% (15/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (196/225) | 46% (150/178) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 42% (5/7) | 43% (6/8) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 43 | 16 |
| DFs per game | 0.38 | 0.6 |
| DFs Total | 78 | 96 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:58:15 | 1:41:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 222.42 | 177.47 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (878/1357) | 61% (720/1177) |
| 1st Serve W% | 57% (498/878) | 58% (415/720) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 41% (196/479) | 39% (176/457) |
| BPs Won% Total | 52% (82/157) | 45% (67/148) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (642/1418) | 46% (495/1066) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 43% (6/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 37% (7/19) | 31% (5/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 57% (4/7) | 33% (2/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 83% (6/5) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 17% (6/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 15% (13/2) | 9% (11/1) |
Jaimee Fourlis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Anca Alexia Todoni
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
44%
(
28 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Tikhonova
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
50%
(
30 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
64%
(
57 of
89)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
85
|
6-4 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dominika Salkova
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
5
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Despina Papamichail
64%
(
56 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
63 of
93)
3
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
44%
(
38 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
43 of
93)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sonja Zhiyenbayeva
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
65%
(
63 of
97)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
110)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
37 of
70)
38%
(
13 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
50%
(
9 of
18)
Break Points Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
51%
(
49 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
57 of
110)
105
Total Points Won
102
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mirjam Bjorklund
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
56%
(
15 of
27)
1st Serve %
50%
(
14 of
28)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
10 of
15)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
83%
(
10 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
7 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
39
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Sara Lanca
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Veronika Erjavec
Player
Jaimee Fourlis
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
30 of
44)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jaimee Fourlis
Player
Deborah Chiesa
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
76%
(
87 of
114)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
43%
(
25 of
58)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
36%
(
9 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
Break Points Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
59%
(
49 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
68 of
114)
102
Total Points Won
95
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Andreea Mitu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Leolia Jeanjean
Player
Andreea Mitu
46%
(
33 of
72)
1st Serve %
79%
(
50 of
63)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
31 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
76
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kateryna Baindl
Player
Andreea Mitu
75%
(
89 of
118)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
10
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
57 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
95)
107
Total Points Won
106
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Laura Mair
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
42%
(
32 of
77)
1
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
8
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
38 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
44 of
77)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
2-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Andreea Mitu
51%
(
41 of
80)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
82
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Priscilla Hon
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Georgia Pedone
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
79%
(
38 of
48)
-
Aces
-
6
Double Faults
1
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
40%
(
28 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Maja Chwalinska
Player
Andreea Mitu
80%
(
63 of
79)
1st Serve %
68%
(
46 of
68)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
5
54%
(
34 of
63)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
25%
(
4 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
52%
(
41 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
41 of
68)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Paula Ormaechea
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
31%
(
9 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
46%
(
33 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
41 of
80)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-0 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andreea Mitu
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
65%
(
54 of
83)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andreea Mitu
Player
Ana Lanisek
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
74%
(
26 of
35)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
3
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
59
Total Points Won
30
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Fourlis Vs Mitu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
